Mark Carney was sworn in today as Canada’s 24th Prime Minister in a ceremony at Rideau Hall, assembling a cabinet that does little to signal a significant departure from the previous administration. While his appointment was positioned as a moment of transition, the reality is a government that remains largely intact from the Trudeau era, with only minor reshuffling.
Chrystia Freeland rejoins Cabinet but this time as Minister of Transport and Internal Trade, an unsurprising retention given her longstanding presence in Liberal leadership circles. Meanwhile, Karina Gould was entirely excluded from the cabinet, a move that speaks to the deepening divisions within the party. As the only candidate to challenge Carney in the debates—though her opposition was little more than a light slap with kid gloves—her absence is a clear indication of how little space exists for dissent within this administration.
The environment portfolio offers another example of continuity disguised as change. Steven Guilbeault has been removed as Minister of Environment and Climate Change but reassigned as Minister of Canadian Culture and Identity, Parks Canada, and Quebec Lieutenant, ensuring he still holds influence over environmental matters. His successor, Terry Duguid, shares a similar background in environmental advocacy, making this a lateral shift rather than a meaningful change in direction.
Jonathan Wilkinson remains in place as Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, despite expectations that replacing him could have strengthened Liberal support in the Atlantic provinces, where energy policy remains a decisive political issue. Carney’s decision to leave this position untouched suggests either a lack of interest in addressing regional concerns or an unwillingness to take the steps necessary to regain lost ground.
Perhaps most baffling is the continued presence of Mélanie Joly as Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Development. Her tenure has been marked by missteps and ineffective diplomacy, yet she retains her position in one of the most critical government roles. The rationale behind this decision remains unclear, but it reinforces the notion that Carney is more concerned with preserving the status quo than making substantive improvements.
The lack of sufficient Indigenous representation in key cabinet roles also stands out. Given the government’s ongoing claims of prioritizing reconciliation, the failure to meaningfully reflect Indigenous leadership at the highest levels of decision-making is a glaring omission.
Beyond the makeup of the cabinet, the government already faces serious political instability. Reports suggest that an election could be called as soon as Monday or within the week, potentially making Carney one of the shortest-serving prime ministers in Canadian history. The circumstances surrounding his appointment—particularly the way in which the leadership process was handled—leave lingering questions about whether this transition was ever intended to be more than a political maneuver.
Adding to the controversy is the issue of financial contributions to the Liberal leadership race. Over 350,000 hard-working Canadians donated to Ruby Dhalla’s campaign, only to have her unfairly disqualified from the race. The party has yet to return those funds, despite the fact that contributors supported her in good faith. Carney now faces the choice of whether to correct this injustice or ignore it altogether. His handling of the issue will be an early test of his willingness to address serious ethical concerns within the party.
Meanwhile, pressing economic and diplomatic concerns remain unresolved. Carney has yet to make formal contact with U.S. President Donald Trump to begin addressing ongoing trade tensions and tariffs. Given the economic uncertainty facing key industries, the absence of immediate action raises further concerns about the government’s priorities.
Carney’s early days in office have done little to suggest a fresh approach. Instead, his government appears to be a continuation of the same leadership that voters have grown increasingly disillusioned with. Whether this strategy will offer stability or lead to further political fallout—especially with the looming prospect of an election—remains to be seen.
About The Author
