“Anonymous Jury” Trump About To Enter Ominous Legal Club

An Anonymous Jury is reserved for drug kingpins like El Chapo, Leroy Barnes, Mob bosses and Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber

The civil rape case against former President Donald Trump by E. Jean Carroll is one of the most controversial cases in recent history. Carroll, a former columnist for Elle magazine, accused Trump of raping her in a department store dressing room in 1995. Trump has vehemently denied the accusation, and the case has been brought to court under New York’s survivor statute, which gives Carroll unlimited time to make a claim.

The case has garnered national attention, with many wondering what the outcome will be. One unique aspect of the case is the use of an anonymous jury. This is done in extreme and rare circumstances where a judge feels there could be legitimate safety concerns for the jurors and the possibility of bribes or coercion.

An anonymous jury is a jury whose members are kept anonymous throughout the trial. Their identities are not revealed to the public, the press, or even the defendant. The purpose of an anonymous jury is to protect the jurors from intimidation, threats, or other forms of coercion that may influence their decision-making.

The use of anonymous juries is not new. It has been used in cases involving illegal drug trafficking, terrorism, and organized crime. The first recorded use of anonymous juries was in 1977 during the trial of Leroy Barnes, the infamous drug kingpin portrayed by Denzel Washington in American Gangster.

The use of anonymous juries is controversial. Some argue that it violates the defendant’s right to a fair trial by preventing them from knowing who is on the jury. Others argue that it is necessary to protect jurors from outside influences that could sway their decision.

If granted, Trump would be in another club he would not want to be associated with, which is the list of criminals that have had anonymous juries. Some of the notable cases include the trials of El Chapo, the notorious Mexican drug lord, and the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski.

Using an anonymous jury in the civil rape case against Trump is significant, as it underscores the severity of the allegations and the potential dangers those involved in the trial face. It also adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious legal battle.

Carroll’s accusation against Trump is not the only sexual assault allegation he has faced. During his presidency, several women accused him of sexual misconduct, including groping and harassment. Trump has denied all of these allegations, and many have criticized him for his handling of the issue.

The use of the survivor statute in Carroll’s case is also notable, as it allows victims of sexual assault to file a civil claim regardless of how much time has passed since the alleged incident. This is a departure from the statute of limitations in criminal cases, which typically requires charges to be brought within a certain time frame after the alleged crime.

The civil case against Trump is also significant because it is one of the few legal battles he has faced since leaving office. Trump has been embroiled in several lawsuits since his presidency, including a criminal investigation into his business dealings in New York.

The use of an anonymous jury in high-profile cases like this one is rare, but it highlights the potential dangers faced by jurors who outside influences may sway. It also underscores the importance of protecting the rights of all parties involved in a trial, including the defendant and the jurors. The decision to use an anonymous jury in Carroll’s case indicates that the judge believes there are legitimate safety concerns for the jurors.