A high ranking officer named Chris Kirkpatrick is facing serious backlash after using an anti Black slur during an internal Afro Caribbean support network meeting, a space meant to be safe, affirming, and culturally specific.
According to multiple accounts, Kirkpatrick was recounting a story from his so called Toronto days when he casually used the slur and then continued speaking. There was no pause, no apology, and no acknowledgment of harm. He simply moved on as if nothing inappropriate had happened.
This occurred inside an Afro Caribbean internal meeting, a space explicitly designed to support Black staff navigating systemic racism within the institution. The setting alone makes the incident impossible to dismiss as ignorance or poor wording. It signals comfort, the kind that comes from believing there will be no real consequences.
Following the incident, Kirkpatrick was suspended with pay. On paper, this appears to be discipline. In practice, many are questioning whether it functions more like a reset than accountability.
For communities that have seen this cycle before, the concern is familiar. Suspension. Silence. Quiet reinstatement. Repeat.
The most unsettling question is not only what was said but where it was said.
If a senior officer felt comfortable enough to use an anti Black slur in a meeting meant specifically for Afro Caribbean support, it raises serious concerns about what language is used behind closed doors. It raises questions about what assumptions are shaping decisions, what biases influence discipline and promotions, and how those same attitudes may affect interactions with the public.
Institutions often claim that internal support networks exist to foster trust and inclusion. Incidents like this do the opposite. They reinforce the fear that even designated safe spaces are conditional and that respect for Black colleagues can disappear without warning.
REAL accountability is not a PAID vacation. It is not administrative leave followed by a carefully worded internal memo.
Real accountability requires a clear acknowledgment of harm. It requires a direct apology rather than silence. It requires transparent consequences that reflect the seriousness of the offense. It also requires structural change to ensure that similar incidents are prevented in the future.
Anything less tells Black staff and Black communities that racial slurs are survivable mistakes rather than disqualifying failures of leadership.
Words matter, especially when they come from people in positions of power. When institutions minimize those words, they do not just protect individuals. They normalize harm.
The question now is not whether Chris Kirkpatrick crossed a line. By all accounts, he did.
The real question is whether those in charge are willing to enforce consequences that actually mean something, or whether this will be remembered as yet another moment when Black communities were told, once again, to accept less.
Watch the report: https://youtube.com/shorts/d7yfIQH4S6o?si=rH4Z_6MUnWmbutON
About The Author
